Portability Evaluation Technique of Application for Heterogeneous Mobile Platform


The KIPS Transactions:PartD, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 123-132, Apr. 2011
10.3745/KIPSTD.2011.18.2.123,   PDF Download:

Abstract

However a mobile application has limited compatibility to other platforms and device. So a mobile application should be rebuilt as particular restrictions of platforms or mobile phones when the mobile application is reused for other platforms. However a mobile application has limited compatibility to other platforms and device. So a mobile application should be rebuilt as particular restrictions of platforms or mobile phones when the mobile application is reused for other platforms. This paper ascertains problems when a mobile application is transplanted for reusing into other platforms, and suggests to evaluation systems of portability`s quality that we can check the portability convenience of the existing mobile application. As we confirm its grade that shows convenience of suggested portability, we are able to check problems issued when a mobile application implants to other platforms. Then it is expected that we can check capability of rebuilding and endeavor rate. Also if the method will be considered at the first step of designing a mobile application, it will be the best way to develop the better mobile application that we can easily implant many other mobile platforms.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
H. Y. Park and H. Y. Yoo, "Portability Evaluation Technique of Application for Heterogeneous Mobile Platform," The KIPS Transactions:PartD, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 123-132, 2011. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTD.2011.18.2.123.

[ACM Style]
Hae Yoon Park and Hae Young Yoo. 2011. Portability Evaluation Technique of Application for Heterogeneous Mobile Platform. The KIPS Transactions:PartD, 18, 2, (2011), 123-132. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTD.2011.18.2.123.