The Correctness Comparison of MCIH Model and WMLF/GI Model for the individual Haplotyping Reconstruction


The KIPS Transactions:PartB , Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 157-164, Apr. 2009
10.3745/KIPSTB.2009.16.2.157,   PDF Download:

Abstract

Minimum Letter Flips(MLF) and Weighted Minimum Letter Flips(WMLF) can perform the haplotype reconstruction more accurately from SNP fragments when they have many errors and gaps by introducing the related genotype information. And it is known that WMLF is more accurate in haplotype reconstruction than those based on the MLF. In the paper, we analyze two models under the conditions that the different rates of homozygous site in the genotype information and the different confidence levels according to the sequencing quality. We compare the performance of the two models using neural network and genetic algorithm. If the rate of homozygous site is high and sequencing quality is good, the results of experiments indicate that WMLF/GI has higher accuracy of haplotype reconstruction than that of the MCIH especially when the error rate and gap rate of SNP fragments are high.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
I. S. Jeong, S. H. Kang, H. S. Lim, "The Correctness Comparison of MCIH Model and WMLF/GI Model for the individual Haplotyping Reconstruction," The KIPS Transactions:PartB , vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 157-164, 2009. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTB.2009.16.2.157.

[ACM Style]
In Seon Jeong, Seung Ho Kang, and Hyeong Seok Lim. 2009. The Correctness Comparison of MCIH Model and WMLF/GI Model for the individual Haplotyping Reconstruction. The KIPS Transactions:PartB , 16, 2, (2009), 157-164. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTB.2009.16.2.157.