Architecture Evaluation Utilizing CBAM and AHP


KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 683-690, May. 2006
10.3745/KIPSTD.2006.13.5.683, Full Text:

Abstract

The CBAM (Cost Benefit Analysis Method) provides a method for deciding the best architectural strategy by considering cost, schedule, and risks as well as the benefits of the architectural strategy. But many parts of the CBAM do not present quantitative evidence explicitly on whether it is the best architectural strategy among others because it depends on the stakeholders’ consensus, vote, and/or intuition. In this study, we apply the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to CBAM to provide explicit quantitative evidence and to reduce the possibility of subjective decision-making errors that may occur in the CBAM.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
J. H. Lee, S. W. Kang, J. H. Cho and J. S. Kim, "Architecture Evaluation Utilizing CBAM and AHP," KIPS Journal D (2001 ~ 2012) , vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 683-690, 2006. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTD.2006.13.5.683.

[ACM Style]
Ji Hyun Lee, Sung Won Kang, Jin Hee Cho, and Jin Sam Kim. 2006. Architecture Evaluation Utilizing CBAM and AHP. KIPS Journal D (2001 ~ 2012) , 13, 5, (2006), 683-690. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTD.2006.13.5.683.